Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 1960 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - $122.03 vs $557.04
- Up to 77% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-7920X - $1.08 vs $4.6 per FPS
- Consumes up to 45% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 77 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 7% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-3770 - 121 vs 113 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 24 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
113
93%
Value, $/FPS
$1.08/FPS
100%
Price, $
$122.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $122.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11573 minutes ago
Buy for $557.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11574 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770 | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |