Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-6700T outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-6700T is 293 days older than the more expensive Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 182 vs 180 FPS
- Up to 27% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $99.9 vs $136.62
- Up to 28% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $0.55 vs $0.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $136.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
182
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $99.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |