Buy on Amazon
$100
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v2 outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v2 is 134 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2
- Performs up to 2% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-6350 - 129 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 125 vs 130 Watts
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD FD6350FRHKBOX FX-6350 FX-Series 6-Core Black Edition
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1763 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1620 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
| 3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
