Buy on Amazon
$81.39
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 2126 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 0% better in Control than Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 201 vs 200 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Ryzen 3 3200G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
201
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$81.39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G 4-Core Unlocked Desktop Processor with Radeon Graphics
Buy for $81.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9905 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E5-1620 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Ryzen 3 3200G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
