Buy on Amazon
$98.15
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $149
Availability
MSRP in USD: $149
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3400G is 2126 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v2.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Performs up to 11% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 123 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 5 3400G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
123
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.8/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.15
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G 4-core, 8-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor with Radeon RX Graphics
Buy for $98.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2537 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1620 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Ryzen 5 3400G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using Xeon E5-1620 v2 or Ryzen 5 3400G
Grand Theft Auto V, 1920 x 1080, Ultra
44 FPS
$18.84/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Ryzen 5 3400G
8 GB, 512 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$829
In Stock
31 FPS
$22.55/FPS
Radeon RX Vega 11
Ryzen 5 3400G
16 GB, 240 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$699
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
