Buy on Amazon
$100
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v2 outperforms Core i7-870 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v2 is 1463 days newer than Core i7-870.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2
- Performs up to 3% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-870 - 118 vs 115 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-870
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 95 vs 130 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Intel Core i7-870 Processor 2.93 GHz 8 MB Cache Socket LGA1156
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2327 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E5-1620 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Core i7-870
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-870 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Lynnfield |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
