Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 1388 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 130 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 2% better in Fortnite than Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 219 vs 215 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 64 vs 8 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E5-1620 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | EPYC |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Naples |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 32 |
| 8 | Threads | 64 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
