Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4702HQ outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4702HQ is 106 days older than Xeon E5-1620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4702HQ
- Performs up to 2% better in World of Tanks than Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 519 vs 510 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 37 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1620 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Core i7-4702HQ
Mobile • May 27th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-4702HQ |
|---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | May 27th, 2013 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel BGA 1364 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 37 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
