Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4130T outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4130T is 9 days older than Xeon E5-1620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130T
- Performs up to 3% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 116 vs 113 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon E5-1620 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Core i3-4130T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 | vs | Intel Core i3-4130T |
|---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 130 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
