Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2620 v3 outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2620 v3 is 363 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Performs up to 26% better in Diablo IV than Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 142 vs 113 FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 85 vs 130 Watts
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell-E |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 85 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |