Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4785T outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4785T is 100 days older than Xeon E5-1620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4785T
- Performs up to 3% better in Overwatch 2 than Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 334 vs 324 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E5-1620 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Core i7-4785T
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-4785T |
|---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
