Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2650 v3 outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2650 v3 is 363 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Performs up to 6% better in Dead Island 2 than Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 133 vs 125 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 105 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 20 vs 8 threads
Dead Island 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1620 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 8 | Threads | 20 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
