Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1265L v3 outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1265L v3 is 34 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3
- Performs up to 9% better in Sons Of The Forest than FX-6350 - 99 vs 91 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 45 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2612 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |