Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700T outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6700T is 821 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 1% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Xeon E3-1265L v3 - 164 vs 163 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3 - 35 vs 45 Watts
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
164
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.61/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $99.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2150 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |