Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1265L v3 outperforms FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1265L v3 is 222 days newer than FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3
- Performs up to 13% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than FX-8300 - 122 vs 108 FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 45 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $112.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 108 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |