Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 2046 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E3-1265L v3 - 187 vs 181 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
187
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
100%
Price, $
$96
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1948 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |