Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1265L v3 outperforms Ryzen 3 2200G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1265L v3 is 1716 days older than Ryzen 3 2200G.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen 3 2200G - 200 vs 198 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 8 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
198
99%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
100%
Price, $
$130
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $130 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1760 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Haswell | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |