Buy on Amazon
$99.9
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $549
Availability
MSRP in USD: $549
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-6700T outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-6700T is 730 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 1% better in Sons Of The Forest than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 100 vs 99 FPS
- Up to 9% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $99.9 vs $109.99
- Up to 10% better value when playing Sons Of The Forest than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $1.0 vs $1.11 per FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700T - 16 vs 8 threads
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-6700T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
100
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i7-6700T 2.8GHz Tray CPU
Buy for $99.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
AMD YD190XA8AEWOF Ryzen Threadripper 1900X (8-core/16-thread) Desktop Processor
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-6700T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Skylake | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
