Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 2333 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 45 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 8% better in Escape From Tarkov than Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 205 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 24 vs 8 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
205
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
100%
Price, $
$188.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $188.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 163 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |