Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1225 v3 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1225 v3 is 181 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3
- Performs up to 5% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Celeron G1610 - 156 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3 - 55 vs 84 Watts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
84 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD P4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |