Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1225 v3 outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1225 v3 is 461 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3
- Performs up to 8% better in Borderlands 3 than FX-6200 - 211 vs 195 FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 84 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3 - 6 vs 4 threads
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Xeon E3-1225 v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3 | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | FX |
| Haswell | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 3 |
| 4 | Threads | 6 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| Intel HD P4600 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
