Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms the more expensive Pentium G4620 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 197 days older than the more expensive Pentium G4620.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4620
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 51 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 5% better in Sons Of The Forest than Pentium G4620 - 100 vs 95 FPS
- Up to 48% cheaper than Pentium G4620 - $78.02 vs $149.99
- Up to 51% better value when playing Sons Of The Forest than Pentium G4620 - $0.78 vs $1.58 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4620 - 12 vs 4 threads
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $149.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4460 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
100
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4461 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G4620 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Pentium | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |