Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3220T outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G3220T is 272 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3220T
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Celeron G1610 - 191 vs 190 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 35 vs 55 Watts
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2285 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3220T | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |