Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Pentium 987 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 2070 days newer than Pentium 987.
Advantages of Intel Pentium 987
- Consumes up to 91% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 17 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 11% better in Elden Ring than Pentium 987 - 120 vs 108 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium 987 - 24 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
120
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.57/FPS
100%
Price, $
$188.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $188.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Feb 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium 987 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Feb 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Pentium | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Colfax |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |