Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6950X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6950X is 672 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6950X
- Performs up to 10% better in Lost Ark than Celeron G4900 - 253 vs 229 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i7-6950X - $68.02 vs $499.0
- Up to 85% better value when playing Lost Ark than Core i7-6950X - $0.3 vs $1.97 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i7-6950X - 54 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17759 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
229
90%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17758 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6950X | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |