Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-6950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900F is 2409 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-6950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 20% better in No Man's Sky than Core i7-6950X - 207 vs 173 FPS
- Up to 13% cheaper than Core i7-6950X - $435.0 vs $499.0
- Up to 27% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i7-6950X - $2.1 vs $2.88 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6950X - 32 vs 20 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1370 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
207
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$435
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $435 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1369 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6950X | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 24 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
140 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |