Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Core i7-640LM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 3191 days newer than Core i7-640LM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-640LM
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 25 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 15% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Core i7-640LM - 139 vs 121 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-640LM - 24 vs 4 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
139
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$197.65
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $197.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4741 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-640LM | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Arrandale | Codename | Colfax |
Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
25 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |