Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700 outperforms Core i7-640LM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-8700 is 2916 days newer than Core i7-640LM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-640LM
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Core i7-8700 - 25 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-8700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700
- Performs up to 19% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-640LM - 177 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-640LM - 12 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
FPS
177
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.13/FPS
100%
Price, $
$200
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $200 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4485 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-640LM | vs | Intel Core i7-8700 |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Arrandale | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
25 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |