Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms Core i7-640LM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 3766 days newer than Core i7-640LM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-640LM
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 25 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 12% better in F1 22 than Core i7-640LM - 279 vs 249 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-640LM - 16 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
279
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.8/FPS
100%
Price, $
$224
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $224 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 740 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-640LM | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Arrandale | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
25 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |