Key Differences
In short — Xeon w7-2495X outperforms Core i7-640LM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon w7-2495X is 4787 days newer than Core i7-640LM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-640LM
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon w7-2495X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon w7-2495X
- Performs up to 68% better in Dirt 5 than Core i7-640LM - 229 vs 136 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-640LM - 48 vs 4 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i7-640LM
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Xeon w7-2495X
Server/Workstation • Feb 15th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-640LM
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Single-Core
377
15.967810249894113%
Multi-Core
681
3.6380148512206847%
Intel Core i7-640LM | vs | Intel Xeon w7-2495X |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Feb 15th, 2023 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Xeon W |
| Arrandale | Codename | Sapphire Rapids |
| Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | Intel Socket 4677 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 24 |
| 4 | Threads | 48 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
| 25 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
