Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Core i7-4800MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1983 days newer than Core i7-4800MQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4800MQ
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 47 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 2% better in Rocket League than Core i7-4800MQ - 710 vs 698 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4800MQ - 24 vs 8 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
710
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$188.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $188.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4800MQ | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |