Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700F outperforms Core i7-4800MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-11700F is 2878 days newer than Core i7-4800MQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4800MQ
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than Intel Core i7-11700F - 47 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-11700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700F
- Performs up to 16% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-4800MQ - 192 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4800MQ - 16 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
192
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$260.91
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $260.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1610 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4800MQ | vs | Intel Core i7-11700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |