Buy on Amazon
$225
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $380
Availability
MSRP in USD: $380
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Core i7-4800MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2558 days newer than Core i7-4800MQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4800MQ
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 47 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 42% better in Diablo IV than Core i7-4800MQ - 218 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4800MQ - 20 vs 8 threads
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
218
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.03/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i9-10900F Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for $225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1422 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-4800MQ
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4800MQ | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 8 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
