Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3930K outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3930K is 105 days older than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3930K
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-6200 - 193 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 12 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i7-3930K - $42.85 vs $280.0
- Up to 84% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i7-3930K - $0.23 vs $1.45 per FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-3930K - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3930K doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $280 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7312 minutes ago
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7312 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3930K | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Nov 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 3 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |