Key Differences
In short — Core i5-5675C outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-5675C is 1173 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-5675C
- Performs up to 14% better in Ready or Not than FX-6200 - 264 vs 232 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i5-5675C - $42.85 vs $90.0
- Up to 47% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i5-5675C - $0.18 vs $0.34 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-5675C - 6 vs 4 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2113 minutes ago
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2113 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-5675C | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
May 15th, 2015 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Broadwell | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 3 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |