Buy on Amazon
$37
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1610 outperforms Core i5-430M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1610 is 1061 days newer than Core i5-430M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-430M
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Performs up to 1% better in God of War than Core i5-430M - 162 vs 161 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-430M doesn't have integrated graphics
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
162
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$37
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-430M
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-430M | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Arrandale | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 17.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
