Key Differences
In short — FX-6200 outperforms Core i5-430M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6200 is 781 days newer than Core i5-430M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-430M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Performs up to 5% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-430M - 229 vs 218 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-430M - 6 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-430M doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
FPS
229
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$42.85
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 113 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-430M | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Arrandale | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 3 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |