Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Core i5-430M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 2063 days newer than Core i5-430M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-430M
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 5% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than Core i5-430M - 155 vs 148 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-430M doesn't have integrated graphics
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
155
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-430M | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Arrandale | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |