Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms Core i5-2520M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 1966 days newer than Core i5-2520M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2520M
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i5-2520M - 201 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2520M - 12 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
201
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 174 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Feb 1st, 2011
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2520M | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Feb 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |