Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 4333 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 134% better in The Callisto Protocol than FX-6200 - 164 vs 70 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 16 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - $42.85 vs $199.98
- Up to 50% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Core i5-14400F - $0.61 vs $1.22 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
164
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.22/FPS
50%
Price, $
$199.98
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for $199.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14400F | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 3 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |