Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8130U outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8130U is 2178 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8130U
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-6200 - 198 vs 190 FPS
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 15 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8130U - 6 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Feb 13th, 2018
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8130U | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Feb 13th, 2018 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 3 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
UHD 620 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |