Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8130U outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8130U is 406 days newer than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8130U
- Performs up to 7% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G3930T - 124 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Celeron G3930T - 15 vs 35 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 132 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Feb 13th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8130U | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Feb 13th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD 620 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |