Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $75.0 vs $139.99
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-7100T - 190 vs 181 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 8 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
Buy for $139.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1116
72.51461988304094%
Multi-Core
2260
48.85430177258971%
Intel Core i3-7100T | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |