Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 320 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 2% better in Rust than Core i3-10105F - 201 vs 197 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 27% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $87.98 vs $120.0
- Up to 25% better value when playing Rust than Core i3-10320 - $0.45 vs $0.6 per FPS
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
197
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
100%
Price, $
$87.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $87.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |