Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 298 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 6% better in Ready or Not than Ryzen 3 3200G - 270 vs 255 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $81.39 vs $120.0
- Up to 27% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i3-10320 - $0.32 vs $0.44 per FPS
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
255
94%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$81.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $81.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |