Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7600.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 1% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i5-7600 - 123 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7600 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $95.97 vs $139.99
- Up to 31% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i3-10320 - $0.79 vs $1.14 per FPS
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
123
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.14/FPS
69.2982456140351%
Price, $
$139.99
68%
FPS Winner
Buy for $139.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
122
99.1869918699187%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
100%
Price, $
$95.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $95.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1373
89.21377517868746%
Multi-Core
3812
82.4038045827929%
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i5-7600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |