Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 1703 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 6% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Core i3-6100 - 145 vs 137 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $100.0 vs $120.0
- Up to 12% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i3-10320 - $0.73 vs $0.83 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3708 minutes ago
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3710 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |