Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 781 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4350.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4350
- Up to 34% cheaper than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $51.6 vs $78.02
- Up to 31% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $0.31 vs $0.45 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 54 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 4% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i3-4350 - 175 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4350 - 12 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $51.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7729 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
175
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
68%
Price, $
$78.02
66%
FPS Winner
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7730 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4350 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Haswell | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |