Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-2100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2599 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2100
- Up to 28% cheaper than Celeron G4900 - $49.0 vs $68.02
- Up to 27% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Celeron G4900 - $0.32 vs $0.44 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 1% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-2100 - 156 vs 154 FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i3-2100 - 54 vs 65 Watts
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5147 minutes ago
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5147 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2100 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Feb 20th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |