Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 2796 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 2% better in Control than Core i3-3220 - 202 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $79.0 vs $120.0
- Up to 32% better value when playing Control than Core i3-10320 - $0.4 vs $0.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 148 minutes ago
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 148 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |